Sunday, January 27, 2008

Kaleidoscope Eyes

National Geographic has always been my favorite magazine.

Ever since I was a kid, I would gaze over the images for hours (my mother collected them) and feel astonished at how much wonder and beauty this world holds that the majority of us never even get to experience. I remember many years ago, I saw an image on the cover of the magazine of a woman/child with striking haunting green eyes that looked like they had a story to tell, but that were fearful.



I was very young, but the image left an impression on me I never forgot. Well, now, some 20 years later, I saw the image again on the cover of National Geographic, for a Collector's edition, and felt inclined to purchase the magazine. Upon reading inside, I discovered that this image was taken of a frightened young woman in a refugee camp in Pakistan. The photo, upon release, incited curiousity, this image provokes questioning...and as a result, this woman's plight, or cause, was brought to light.

This is how media can be positive, and good, and can redeem itself. If we could stray away from the Star Magazines and the Cosmopolitans, Vogues, Allures, and look at how much inspiration comes from abroad, perhaps journalism could be restored to something virtuous and honorable.

A fund that National Geographic raised inspired by this woman's visual story raised over a million dollars. I hope that our current state of obsession with pulchritude is a phase, and that the rebellion, or antithesis of such will bring a resiliant passion for our fellow man that can redeem us and take us to a place as a society where we can improve the world, not dwell on the promiscuity of celebrities or other such trivialities.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

The Ugly Business of Beauty

Even for the beautiful, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

Before: A University of Arizona law student, who had won the title of Miss Pima County in 2005, was a supporter of S.H.A.R.P. (Students Helping and Reaching People), and the drama of her life involved doing a theatrical interpretation of the "Phenomenal Woman".





After:
In the most recent of a slew of beauty pageant gals gone awry, 25-year old Kumari Fulbright of Arizona kidnapped her ex-boyfriend with a few friends and tortured, robbed, and beat him for several hours, telling him she would kill him while holding a butcher knife in his ear. She was indicted along with the accomplices, yielding this mugshot:




Not so pretty after 10 hours of hooliganism. This story has been getting lots of attention on the internet, namely being run as top news stories on abcnews.com, aol.com, and yahoo.com, to name a few of the more viewed.

Another story that gained a lot of buzz at one time was the story of the peppered dress, when Miss Puerto Rico Ingrid Marie Rivera claimed that ruthless pageant sabateurs had put pepper spray in her evening gown, causing her to have an itchy allergic reaction. Then there were the test results that came out saying there were no traces of pepper spray on the dress, causing most people to think she was either delusional or opportunistic.




What didn't gain much press, and has been overshadowed by Fulbright, is the fact that the second forensic test proved that there were traces of pepper spray on her gown. Why haven't the media outlets put this up in their headlines with the same voracity they did the veiled allegations? Not as interesting I suppose.

It's disappointing to see that even the big boys work in absolutes, she was already painted as a victim, then as a bad character, can't do another 180... the fact is the truth isn't as valued as the scandal, and Fulbright will continue to soak up the sour limelight.

Saturday, December 22, 2007

China Revisited: Santa, China, Obama

On a recent blustery afternoon, I ventured to the neighborhood Hobby Lobby in search of some ceramic Santas to get in the holiday spirit. When I arrived, it seemed I had two options: the "cheap" Santas, or the "pricey" Santas. The "cheap" Santas varied in disfigurement: some were missing eyebrows, others fingers, one an entire eyeball.

These Santas, made in China, were selling for under $10. The "pricey" Santas had more vibrant paint colors, more rosy cheeks, and most importantly, all of their digits and facial features. These were made in the United States, but were $20 more expensive.



I had just experienced a dilemma that I am sure plagues people all over the world when it comes to Chinese products: Do we forgo quality in favor of a bargain? Or maybe the problem we face is more domestic. Maybe the American appetite for schlocky bric a brac is so insatiable that we are willing to plunk down our dollars any time we see something cheap, thus creating the demand.

As Americans, we have been hearing negative things about the Chinese for years. While no entity is all good or all bad, it seems collectively we exude a holier-than-thou attitude towards China. From their "one child per family" mantra, to their stringent Communist regime, to their slave-like working conditions, we are fed negativity on a daily basis through our media and leadership.



In recent headlines, China has been outright vilified, namely for its imports, that include toys with lead paint, beads with trace amounts of GHB--also referred to as the "date rape drug", fish with enough mercury to turn someone into a human thermometer, and toothpaste with an anti-freeze ingredient in it. So the logical question seems to be one of the chicken or the egg variety. Is it that we love our cheap products so much we forgive egregious offenses and neglect to demand quality, or are we so reliant on China we can't say no? Either way, the blame is as much ours as anyone’s.

We know that China does not seem to place a high value on quality of products. From rising boycotts on Chinese toys to leaked evidence that there are sweatshops that exhibit "brutal" working conditions, China's international public image leaves much to be desired. But maybe the root of this condition is not a failure in the market mechanism of supply and demand, but a failing on our part to apply some common sense to what we demand. I, for one, can not imagine the developed countries of Europe in line at their local megamart picking through Santa's with missing appendages.

The U.S. reaction to this? There have been many different voices rising: namely politicians, bloggers, reporters, and consumers giving their opinion on what should be done to alleviate this problem.


Some recommend a tariff structure that will basically level the playing field, causing imported goods to be about par with American products, thinking this will eventually weed China out, or force them to "step up their game", and make products of comparable quality. The blatant problem with this is that not everybody can pay the higher prices for goods.




In one of the recent Democratic Debates, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois made the best recommendation: that the U.S. adopt a policy similar to that of Japan:

"You know what Japan does with the Chinese when it comes to, for example, food importation? They send their own inspectors over to China and they set up their own safety system and they say, "If you don't abide by our rules, you can't send food into Japan. Now, the question is, why doesn't the United States impose these same rules and regulations as Japan has? This is the biggest market -- this is the biggest market in the world. China has to sell here.”

Later on, Obama says something that rings very true:
“China is a competitor, but they don't have to be an enemy as long as we understand that they are going to be negotiating aggressively for their advantage.”

Yes, we don’t want China sending us products that are safety hazards. But, the fact is, we depend too heavily on China to “quit being their friend”-70 to 80 percent of our toys, for example, come from China. Critics have said that implementing these inspections may drive up prices, but on products that pose a huge risk, that seems a better option than death.
Ultimately, the consumers are going to select their favorite options. At the local Hobby Lobby, there are more $30 Santas left to collect dust on the shelf than $10 deformed Santas. It seems the market has chosen, and China isn’t to blame.

Friday, December 21, 2007

FCC Consolidation



In 2003, the new rules of the FCC were thrown out, even though President Bush threatened to veto Congress if they threw out these rules. Well, it appears the FCC is at it again: they are trying to loosen the regulations that currently forbid cross-ownership, so that in the future, media outlets (other than the ones grandfathered in) will be able to own print and broadcast media. This will give 6-7 media tycoons access to over 90% of the market. I don't know about you, but I don't want my news being determined by Rupert Murdoch of myspace fame. To sign a petition agains this, see:

http://civic.moveon.org/mediaconsolidation/o.pl?id=11826-6730547-.VQsfJ&t=4




In the Star Tribune, they had an article about this issue:

http://www.startribune.com/nation/12569816.html

And last year, there was apparently a report that villafied consolidation of media, that was quashed:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-rintels/fcc-report-says-media-con_b_29452.html

Friday, December 7, 2007

Dangers of a Generation Lost in MySpace



For social networking purposes, sites like Myspace and Facebook are great, and they can also be a great source for companies to mingle with their markets...but there are dangers also that these social sites present.

It's not just that porn peddlers can post on your page, that creepy pervs can laciviously try to proposition adolescents, or that some black market exists where individuals will try to sell everything from viagra to xanax to you.

MySpace can be deadly.



Take the story of Megan Meier. This 13 year old girl is driven to take her life by a psycho pageant mom type who meddles in the lives of middle schoolers. She even is rumored to have started a blogspot called "Megan Had It Coming".



So even though MySpace is Goliath, doesn't it still owe some sort of transparency to the public it serves? Shouldn't there be a way to verify people are who they say? Maybe that is too much to ask, but Rupert Murdoch is a billionaire, you'd think he could make the site at least a little safer.

How do you trust a site that is built on lies? Tom, the MySpace friend who started it all, has lied about his age from day one.



So how do you trust a company that doesn't value honesty, even on trivial matters?

The answer is you can't. Even though this network seems to be an unstoppable beast, it is up to companies and individuals to realize that MySpace is not all good, and probably not the best company to mingle with to promote or publicize a business.

Monday, December 3, 2007

Tex Mex

While working at a certain gallery, the assistant museum coordinator had an idea: how about doing a Tex-Mex inspired exhibit, and calling it "Tex-Mex"? Well, immediately, I think everyone was a little bewildered as to how cuisine tied into an upcoming art show. Well, she explained that her idea was to recruit Texan artists who were of Mexican descent to display their art in the exhibit, and that the opening reception could have margaritas, nachos, and other Tex-Mex dishes. At this point in the conversation, I want to give her props for deciding to do an exhibit that highlights diversity, but at the same time feel the title and theme are exploitive in nature, even though her intent is cutesiness: it seems almost demeaning. Then comes the real zinger.





"Maybe we can go down to towns on the border and see what kind of artists there are. They will probably be thrilled at the opportunity..."

What?!!??!

As if to insinuate that all Mexican-Americans in Texas live on the border, or that they all are poor and would jump through hoops for a couple of pesos... Unbelievable...I responded that I have a friend who is a sculptor, makes his own glazes, does really beautiful work, is partially of Mexican descent,and she asked me his name. When I told her the Irish last name, she asked what he looks like. I told her he has blond hair, at which point she informed me, "no, he needs to look Mexican."

I think everyone in the meeting was shocked, as she seemed completely oblivious to how she sounded. The art director changed the subject, and we all agreed to go with a different theme.

Monday, November 26, 2007

Silkwood

I recently saw the story of Karen Silkwood as portrayed by Meryl Streep. It was shocking to me that Kerr-McGee, the plutonium plant she worked at, could get away with such negligence in regards to their plant safety. What really was creepy was how the samples taken from her home showed huge levels of plutonium, yet the ones that the company took were moderately low. Picture from SanDiego.edu archives





The plant was basically killing people for profit, or at the very least had no regard for their safety and well-being. As is often the case, the whistle-blower gets the most heat, as co-workers of hers were disgruntled over her attempts to expose Kerr-McGee's unsafe practices. She died suspiciously in a one car crash while trying to expose these wrongs. The plant finally closed in 1975, but the civil litigation went on for years. It makes you wonder how often this sort of stuff goes on in large companies that we DON'T ever get to hear about. Big companies seem like they accept dirty business practices, as long as profits are rolling in.